![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
|
![]() |
||||
|
See below
a summation of some of the ideas that provide the themes of these paintings.
|
|||||
Whilst a young boy I visited Albany, on the Southern Coast of Western Australia, visiting a then active whaling station- effectively an abattoir for the huge whale carcasses. The experience, in all its colorful, grotesque and pungent reality stayed with me, and can be noted as the initial impetus for these works. I find the shocking drama of the whaling station a useful theme to explore in context with the dislocating aspects of the human condition as described in the section 'Evolutionary Psychology' (see below). The ships, themselves marooned in 'dry dock' relate to a vivid dream I also recall from childhood, and they loom in the works as the defunct rusting hulks of an alienating Industrial age. Stylistically, I enjoy the large volumes and rotund curves of the ships and whales, which serve to subjugate the individuals within the picture as well as the viewer as witness to a larger theme. The relationship of whale and boat, a pairing of elements each dislocated from its natural state, and serving as a metaphor for our own detachment as well as the dichotomy between the whales reverence within human mythology and its petty value as a mass commodity for meat, baleen and oil.
The idea of a dichotomy, both a reverence and a flagrant, tragic exploitation of the various creatures of the Earth is, as with the whale series of paintings, a continued theme of this work. The archetypal 'charismatic vertebrates' celebrated almost universally in mythology - the Lion, Tiger, Elephant, Whale, Dolphin, Monkeys and Apes etc, trained to perform acrobatic or 'amusing' tasks for spectators, neatly portrays this dichotomy. These animals are often captured and held in cruel conditions, trained by intimidation to perform repetitive tasks often designed to emulate a human-like act. This anthropomorphisation is at once cruel and telling in its ignorance. The paintings here represent the alien nature of the circus environment, as a back drop for an exploration of the human condition, as well as our detached, indeed ignorant, association with these large, enigmatic beasts. The idea of the Elephant going through its pathetic repertoire of tricks before a non-existent audience seeks to further evoke the detached relationship we have created with our natural world. The pot plant motif can be seen as a literal 'transplantation' of the natural world, standardised and sanitised - a motif which represents our uncompromising and facile appropriation of other living things.
In the Box-Ironbark country side of the region of Dunolly, central Victoria, Australia, local lore has it that a circus Elephant escaped its moorings and was on the run from the Ashtons Circus company. The Elephant was said to be on the run for about 3 days before being recaptured and returned to service with the circus. The paintings here portray the 3 days whereby the Elephant was within the Australian landscape. I imagine the Elephant, unaccustomed to its liberation and environment, reverting to its repertoire of tricks, even in this context of freedom. This serves as metaphor for both the animals and perhaps our own dislocation from a 'natural state'. Elephant Captured After Night in Australian Bush
The open woodland scrub of Central Victoria is known as 'Box-Ironbark'
forest. Occupied for thousands of years by man, the area is also steeped
in the history of the Colonial days. It is the 'Gold Rush' country of
Australian folklore. The woodland is unique, and remains under-represented
within the tradition of Australian landscape painting. The Box-Ironbark
country stretches across northern Victoria from Stawell in the west, to
Wodonga in the north-east. It joins with similar woodlands that form the
wheat and sheep belts of NSW and South Australia. Only 17 percent of the
original Box-Ironbark woodlands and forests exist today, and almost all
of these have been subject at some stage to intensive logging. There is
virtually no virgin Box-Ironbark forest left, and today's remnant forests
remain dramatically altered. Nonetheless, these forests have a unique
ecosystem, atmosphere and light, and at times, become peculiarly still
and silent. A beautiful, and quintessentially Australian pattern exists
within these environments that presents a particular challenge to the
artist. - Dale Cox 2003
The ‘Blackground’ series of paintings represent a continuation of the Circus and Whale series in the fundamental sense, as all explore the notion of Human association with the natural world. The title ‘Blackground’ is a literal play on words, alluding of course to the stark black arena in which these compositions are set. The works themselves might also be seen literally in terms of their visual interpretation. Some of the animals are seen encumbered with a ‘manufactured’ representation of themselves. They are the grounded, original vertebrates from which the fantastical effigies are strapped, tied, or suspended. I am attempting here to (literally) bridge the real animal and its anthropomorphised* alter ego The pairings of each animal present the anomaly between actual and perceived states of being. The distorted, exaggerated representations of each creature, or in some instances, their reduction to a cartoon outline in coloured lights, contrast jarringly with the actual creature below. That we have continuously sought to represent the world’s fauna in these anthropomophisised ways says much about our narrow understanding of these animals. In much popular culture we attribute to other creatures human characteristics, personalities, behavior and value models. The creatures are vehicles used merely to convey otherwise essentially human themes. Think Disney. These paintings explore notions of the fundamental lack of appreciation for even these most ‘charismatic vertebrates’* When I speak of appreciation, I refer to the idea of understanding what these animals really are. With even a slightly more sympathetic appreciation of other species we afford ourselves an opportunity to see our place within a broader environment of unique and dramatically different ways of being. In doing so we might better understand our place amongst the other creatures with which we share planet Earth. We may even more readily understand ourselves. Dale Cox November 2003 * ‘anthropomorphise’ meaning an animal that has been given human traits or physical features. The degree of anthropomorphisation can vary widely, from something as simple as an animal with human speech and thought processes, to a creature that is made to look and behave nearly like a human. * ‘Charismatic vertebrate’ is a loose term used to describe animals popularly, and widely recognized, ‘flagship species’ steeped in mythological or popular folk lore. Elephants, Tigers, Wolves, Bears, Gorillas, Eagles, whales etc. Australian examples would be koalas, kangaroos, kookaburras etc. Much is done to try to preserve these enigmatic species, whilst few species enjoy such attention.
Our relationship to the natural world, being in part our arrogant disregard for it, is a central recurring theme in my reading, thinking and subsequent work. I’ve always pondered just when we as an animal began to believe we were somehow separate from the natural world around us. While this disassociation is woven into the very tapestry of human ‘civilization’ from well before recorded history, the frantic escalation of this division, or more so the practical implications of it, are neatly explored within the fledgling science of evolutionary physchology. The science examines the notion of the ‘natural’ human mind versus the artificial applications to which it is subject today.
New insights have been recently afforded us by a growing group of biologists, psychologists, anthropologists and sociologists. This ‘Evolutionary Psychology’ deals with the physiological parameters of the human brain, generally agreed to have evolved very little- as according to the necessary time parameters required for natural selection- for thousands of years. Putting this in context with the rapid changes to the ways in which we live, and the world we have created since historical accounts are available. Is there perhaps a marked and significant disparity between what the brain of Homo Sapiens has evolved to do, and what we now ask of ourselves within our ‘modern societies’?
Does the human brain and its resident physiological ‘hard wiring’ (virtually unchanged in an evolutionary sense for tens of thousands of years) find itself preoccupied and indeed ‘stuck’ on the pre-industrial, even prehistoric imperatives of immediate survival (food) attaining shelter (security) and reproduction (Genetic investment)? Or rather, do these imperatives underlie and actually propel the myriad of other ‘higher’ pursuits with which Homo Sapiens often cite as the defining distinctions between ourselves and other living things?
The science (Evolutionary Psychology) is revealing some interesting insights into these questions. The rise and fall of Empires, the invention of the Atom Bomb, the silicon chip, to the writing of a great novel, may all be addressed within the context of these primary imperatives. The disparity between the natural mind and the ‘modern mind’ might even (unfortunately) partially explain the global environmental crisis, and our resident apathy towards effectively addressing - indeed fully comprehending - the necessary solutions. - Dale Cox 2003 |
|||||